Wednesday, July 31, 2024

Reemployment after Retirement

 


(Downloaded from internet)

 After the elections were over and before BJP formed the government, the General Administration (GA) department in Odisha asked all the departments for furnishing details regarding the employees reemployed after retirement; though the policy regarding reemployment of the BJP government was not then known.  The GA department took the step with all sincerity, for the new government might ask to know about the issue

The employees, from fourth class to the top bureaucrats, desire, and strive to get reemployment after retirement. This is more so for the last few years. Most of them become successful. It’s not true that those officers or employees are more efficient, and indispensable. There are no cogent reasons for an employee to increase his efficiency in the last five years before his retirement than what efficiency he has after twenty-five years in government service.

One officer was looking after legal affairs in a department. Since no substitute was found to manage law as efficiently as he did, the government did not transfer him and he stayed there for more than twenty years. He was expecting reemployment after his retirement, but he was not considered. It’s a fact the criteria for reemployment are not only good work or efficiency, but something other. One has to satisfy the higher boss or the authority; and the authority is not satisfied only with your work, but for some other traits and services. The aforesaid officer did not have the other qualities.

Another example: One officer does not stand straight before the secretary or the minister; always stands bending, making at least his torso forty-five-degree angle to his lower part of the body below his waist. He never says no to what the higher officers or the ministers say. On the other hand, he directs his subordinate to do the job saying the secretary or minister desires. If it is not within the purview of law, he does not have scruples to bend the law. He is reemployed after his retirement, has already worked for four years post-retirement, and still working. Examples are galore of such officers getting reemployment.


                                                     (Published in the Prameya)

The officer with propensity to please the boss cannot remain impartial, cannot do justice to the public. One gets promotion in government service after one senior retires on superannuation or if one dies in service, making a post vacant, on the basis of entries by the higher authorities in his confidential conduct record (CCR). It’s natural the flatterer, the officer with an instinct to please the higher ups gets outstanding entries in CCR, irrespective of whether or not he is a worker or a shirker. In the prevailing system, reemployment has adverse impact on the administration. If someone discharging his duty is not rewarded, how can he have the motivation to work?  He will resort to what the officer who stands bending his body before the authority, does.

The Chief Minister, after he was sworn in, told the press sixty-two thousand post of teachers and above two lakh posts in government were lying vacant. An additional secretary’s salary per month, on an average, is one lakh and fifty thousand rupees. If he is reemployed after retirement, he gets pension minus salary which comes to around seventy-five thousand rupees. Besides, he enjoys the facilities of a chauffeur driven car, services of peons, personal assistants, etc. In place of reemployment, a fresh officer can be recruited; an unemployed youth can get employment.

The identity of an officer is the post he holds in government, and the power that goes with the post. The identity, he feels, is lost on his retirement. He does not get the benefits of free use of car, peon or a personal assistant. He cannot afford all those with his pension. He also loses the power of the post. Hence, he needs the job after he is retires. The authority also needs the kind of officers who does not object, but works to satisfy him and to his requirement. The unhealthy honeymoon of the authority and subservient goes on well. The need of the time when there is large unemployment, is to break this tradition.

*****

1 comment:

  1. Well written. Good presentation in the current scenario, of Government jobs. Does it mean that the competency of a person is the last date of a particular age? Many countries do not have the concept of retirement. Even the private companies follow the same dictum. Earlier people were hanging to get a government job, but now there are several scope are there, as private entities have good openings where competency and capabilities matter. So not only in Government sectors, but can't we think of all available facilities in the domains of employment?

    ReplyDelete