(With P.K.Biswal, Under Secretary, Finance and John Evans, Project Director, Crown Agents, UK . The DFID, UK had appointed Crown Agents, a consultancy firm to study and suggest for implementation of VAT in Odisha )
Most of the senior officers felt uncomfortable to
accept the idea of VAT, but they, being in government job, could do anything,
and were helpless. Some officers who had retired from Odisha Finance Service
opposed, and wrote articles in newspapers. The newspapers loved to publish
anything anti-establishment, the people loved to read anti-establishment stories.
The dealers also did not want VAT.
The officers had served their entire service career in
sales tax system, were well versed in the pros and cons, nuances of sales tax
law; they were afraid of the change. The VAT along with reforms in the
administrative structure would also strip them off the power over the dealers,
and impede vested interests.
One day Mohan Kumar was discussing with B.B.Das. He
said, “There are some who are writing against VAT, spreading misinformation and
creating adverse opinion among the public. Those who are writing have not
understood VAT and its implication. It will create difficulty for us to
implement. Can’t any of us write about VAT to counter their misinformation?”
B.B.Das said, “Tell Sahadev, he can.”
Commissioner called me and explained the situation and
told me to write on VAT. I started writing in the newspapers on VAT and tax
administration. All the distinguished newspapers in Odisha published my
articles. My consistent writing in newspapers made me familiar with the general
readers, academics, business people and other stakeholders.
But the newspapers’ publishing my articles and my
familiarity or popularity with the public was not to the liking of many
colleagues and senior officers of the department. They expressed their
displeasure in different ways and deeds. One day, a senior additional
commissioner alleged before the commissioner, “Sir, Sahadev is a junior
officer. How is he writing in newspapers? Being a government servant, he cannot
write; it is against the conduct rules.”
He did not know G.Mohan Kumar had told me to write.
Commissioner said, “I have told him to write, to neutralize the canards spread
by some people. Let him do, it’s a good thing he does.”
Commissioner’s reply discomfited the additional
commissioner. He said, “Sir, does he show you what he writes before he sends to
the newspapers?”
Commissioner said, “Not necessary, he is free to write
what he likes. I know he won’t write anything against.”
Commissioner called me after he left his chamber, for
the daily afternoon session of checking VAT draft. B.B.Das and additional
commissioner (Revenue) were present. Commissioner said, “You go on writing,
don’t fear. I am with you.”
This additional commissioner wrote an article on VAT
and got it published in ‘Sambad’. He had also made literal translation of
English words, like the one the assistant commissioner, Bhubaneswar range did
of G.C.Pati’s essay and it was not comprehensible. Soumya Ranjan Patnaik, editor,
‘Sambad’ telephoned me and asked the meaning of certain words used in the
article. I explained the connotations and purposes of those words. He laughed
at such uses. I said, “Sir, you have published it in your newspaper!” He said, “You don’t understand, we have also
a sales tax registration. We purchase newsprint and other taxable goods. Why
should we displease a senior officer? If displeased, he may make a case against
us, and we will be running to the courts. Better to publish his article and
please him. Do the readers read all the news and articles published daily?”
After this one, ‘Sambad’ did not publish any of
additional commissioner’s articles.
I continued my writing, especially when someone wrote
against VAT I countered him and published it in the newspaper he had published
his. I was trying to write in simple and lucid language so that a common man,
the newspaper reader understood. My articles got attention of different
organisations, trade and industry bodies, and tax bar associations, colleges
and universities. I got invitations from them to be guest or speaker in
seminars they organised on VAT and tax system.
(In a seminar, organised by Institute of Company Secretaries, Bhubaneswar)
One day I was sitting in my office room. The secretary
of an NGO met me and said, “We are organizing a seminar on VAT. Trilochan
Kanungo is the chief guest. He told us to invite you to be a speaker. The other
speaker is Nageswar Patnaik of Economics Times.”
A few days back, Sambad had published an article of
Trilochan Kanungo on VAT. In the article he argued VAT would be against the
interest of Odisha, the state would incur loss and the poor people would
suffer. I response to that article I wrote one which Sambad published on January
6, 2005. (Odisha Assembly had passed Odisha VAT Act in December,2004, VAT was scheduled to be introduced in April,2005) On the article, the editor ‘Sambad’ commented in bold letters,
“Recently, the veteran politician and economic expert, Trilochan Kanungo, in
this column, raises some doubts on implementation of VAT in Odisha. He is of
the view, VAT will not favour a poor state like Odisha. The writer of this
feature has argued in favour, this may be taken as a reply to Kanungo’s doubts and apprehensions.”
(The article was published in Sambad on 06.01. 2005)
I attended the seminar. After that, Trilochan Kanungo,
when he passed by our office would drop in, meet me for a chitchat. One day he
said, “You have reproached me in your article.”
I never did. I had great respect for him as an honest
politician and an intellectual. His accusation surprised me. In my article I
had also not mentioned his name. The editor took his name in his comment. But
he did not relish the quote from “The Alchemist” of Paulo Coelho; I had given
to begin the feature. The quote was: I
don’t want to change, because I don’t know how to deal with change. I am used
to the way I am.
I told I did not quote Celho with a view to hurting
him. I began the feature with the quote to make the article attractive. It
would get the attention of the readers. He understood.
I realised my writings, without my intention, were,
sometimes, aggressive, but people liked it that way. Many readers and
stakeholders had told me.
*****